TL;DR
Get school and study supplies delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
arXiv says it began applying a new limit on Oct. 1, 2026: each submitter may make up to two submissions per calendar month and have no more than three active submissions at a time. The change applies across subject categories, and rejected papers still count toward the monthly cap.
arXiv introduced a new submission limit on October 1, restricting each submitter to two submissions per calendar month and three active submissions at any one time. The repository says the policy is intended to spread the work of its volunteer moderators more fairly and address a sharp rise in submissions, including papers moderators say do not meet its scholarly standards.
The cap applies to all subject categories and is based on submissions, not on papers accepted or announced. arXiv says a rejected submission still counts toward the submitter’s monthly total. Authors who use both monthly submissions must wait until the next calendar month to submit again, even if neither paper is accepted.
The existing limit of three active submissions remains in place. A submission still on hold from an earlier month does not use up the next month’s two-submission allowance, but it does count toward the three-active-submission ceiling. The policy applies to the person who submits a paper: a co-author’s monthly allowance is not affected when another author submits on their behalf.
arXiv reported 40,363 submissions in September 2026, a record for a single month, and said this generated almost 9,000 support tickets for staff and moderators. The repository compared that total with 20,569 submissions in September 2024 and 9,869 in September 2016. It also said submissions in its cs.AI category rose more than sixfold over the previous two years; other categories doubled over that period.
The policy directly changes how researchers can schedule work on arXiv. Authors with multiple papers, conference deadlines or submissions across different fields must plan around a single monthly allowance shared across categories. Because rejected papers count, using the limit on a submission that does not meet arXiv’s standards may leave an author unable to submit another paper until the following month.
arXiv says the restriction is aimed at protecting moderator capacity and reducing delays for authors submitting work that meets its guidelines. The repository’s account is that a relatively small group of submitters has been responsible for many low-quality papers, taking a disproportionate share of volunteer time. That is arXiv’s explanation for the policy; the announcement does not quantify how many authors or submissions fall into that group.
The change also affects the pace at which new work can appear on the repository. A cap may help moderators distribute their attention, but it can also constrain researchers with several legitimate papers or time-sensitive conference work. arXiv advises those authors to plan submissions carefully. Its announcement does not describe an exemption process for urgent or unusual cases.
academic paper submission management software
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Why arXiv Changed Its Submission Rules
arXiv has used rate limits before, with restrictions previously left largely to moderator discretion. The repository says it is applying the new cap across submitters and categories as a stopgap while it considers practices for authors using increasingly capable AI tools and works to improve moderation tools and procedures. The announcement does not say the limit is permanent.
arXiv permits authors to use AI tools in support of research if that use is disclosed and the work satisfies the repository’s scholarly standards. It says moderators have seen more narrowly scoped papers, papers that divide a single work into multiple smaller submissions, and dense papers written with AI assistance. Those descriptions are observations from arXiv moderators, not a finding that AI use itself violates policy.
The repository’s submission requirements remain in effect: papers are expected to present original, novel and significant self-contained research relevant to an arXiv category and of scholarly interest. The new monthly cap changes the rate at which a person may submit; it does not replace those standards or make the submission limit dependent on whether a paper is accepted.
““arXiv now limits submitters to up to two submissions per calendar month, with a limit of three total active submissions at any given time.””
— arXiv
researcher document organization tools
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Open Questions on the New Cap
arXiv describes the policy as a stopgap, but has not specified how long it will remain in force, when it will review its effects or what evidence would lead to a revision. It also has not provided a breakdown of the September submission total by submitter, acceptance outcome or paper type.
The announcement attributes part of the growth in submissions to advanced AI tools and says moderators are seeing more papers they consider low quality. It does not quantify what portion of the overall increase is linked to AI, nor does it detail how moderators distinguish AI-assisted work that meets arXiv’s standards from work that does not. No specific changes to moderation procedures or tools are laid out.
The published FAQ explains how the cap works for rejected papers, cross-category submissions, submissions on hold and co-authors. It does not describe a waiver or appeal route for authors facing a conference deadline or other time constraint. The extent to which the limit will affect review delays or the number of submissions is not yet known.
academic writing and submission planner
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Reviewing the Policy’s Effects
For now, authors must follow the two-submission monthly cap and the three-active-submission limit. arXiv says it will use the stopgap period to consider practices for submissions in an era of more advanced AI tools and to improve moderation tools and procedures. The announcement gives no timetable for that work or for a further policy decision.
Researchers managing a backlog or conference deadlines should account for both limits when choosing when to submit, arXiv advises. Readers and authors will be able to judge the policy’s effects as the repository reports further information; no monitoring measures or date for a public review were specified in the announcement.
research collaboration and project tracking tools
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
How many papers can one person submit to arXiv each month?
Each submitter may make up to two submissions per calendar month. The rule applies across all arXiv categories.
Does a rejected paper count toward the monthly limit?
Yes. arXiv says the limit counts submissions, whether accepted or rejected. After making two submissions in a month, the submitter must wait until the next month to submit again.
What happens if a paper is still on hold?
A submission on hold from a previous month does not count against the next month’s two-submission allowance. It does count toward the separate three-active-submission limit.
Does submitting a paper affect the co-authors’ limits?
No. arXiv says its rate limits apply to the submitter. A paper submitted by one author counts toward that person’s allowance, not the co-authors’ limits.
Can authors request an exception for a conference deadline?
The announcement advises authors to plan ahead for conference deadlines and backlogs, but it does not describe an exception or waiver process.
Source: hn
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
